Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Happy Gnew Year




Practicing Gnostic Christians include New Year's Day as one of their Holy Days. Here's an explanation from the good gnostics at Gnosis.org:


New Year's Day occurs in the Christmas cycle as one the twelve days of Christmas, the period between the ending of the lunar calendar and the beginning of the solar year, a time betwixt and between, a time of misrule when the usual rules and authorities of the world are suspended. It is a time of temporary chaos, confusion, celebration, and breaking down of
old established forms to make way for a new light and new resolutions, the eternal new-born child of the year. These twelve days represent an opportunity for a psychological and spiritual renewal as well.
As a good gneo-gnostic, I will inform my own New Year's meditations and celebrations with this wonderful bit of gnostic mythology about the "usual rules" beings "suspended" by allowing my imaginative powers to envision what I might bring forth from within for myself and for my family in 2009.

New Year's Day for gnostics typically includes a Thanksgiving ceremony as well, so I'll also be giving thanks for the incredible blessings of 2008.

"The consummation of Gnostic rebirth gives us a way to transcend the sense of loss and pain, and to make the transitions and passages in our lives occasions for renewal and joy."

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Discover the X in Christmas


One of the Advent messages brought by my pastor at the tiny United Methodist Church where I'm a member and have attended frequently for 30 years was a standard Orthodox sermon built around the popular theme of putting "Christ" back into "Christmas". It was a nice message and I enjoyed it, particularly the part where Pastor Peggy, an exceedingly competent and sincere Orthodox minister, took on the practice of substituting "X" for "Christ" in the word Christmas.

As I sat there taking in Peggy's fine Advent sermon, I was looking forward to reminding her after the service that an "X" is one of the symbols early Christians used to represent Christ. Therefore, of course, the word "Xmas" literally represents "Christmas" making it unnecessary to rail against the former as an offense to the Spirit of the season. To Pastor Peggy's credit, however, she explained at a later point in her homily that even though an "X" is, in fact, an ancient symbol for "Christ", that most contemporary users of the term aren't reflecting upon the Christolic Symbology of the letter "X" as a representation of "Christ" when they jot down Xmas in place of Christmas in a likely attempt to further secularize the meaning of Christmas.

OK, fair enough, I thought and I shared a laugh with her after the service that I was gonna get on her about the "X" until she adeptly preempted my protest.

I'm writing this post after Christmas dinner as I sit on the couch in my wife's mother's basement with my wife and two children. We are in the midst of a Christmas Movie Marathon. For whatever reason, I started thinking about the business of how the use of "X" for Christ fits so well for those of us who approach our Christ with a Gnostic Spirit of Gnot-Gnowing. As an interesting alternative to the common Orthodox concerns about substituting an "X" for "Christ" in "Christmas", I'm thinking how the letter "X" in its form of the variable in an equation actually perfectly represents Christ -- especially at Christmas.

The story of the literal Christ of literalistic believers, ironically, can easily be proven to be a more derivative and unoriginal story than that of the "X" of history we intentionally unorthodox seekers find buried in the shallow grave of the Orthodox Christmas. The Orthodox Christ was literally born of a Virgin on December 25th in identical fashion to Mythra, which stole the same story from the ancient Egyptian God, Horace.

So, it is the Orthodox Christ of the traditional Christmas story that is an inappropriate substitution for the "X" of "Xmas" instead of the other way around!

The Orthodox Christ was nothing new, but the Gnostic Christ presents the same "X" variable to human beings today that it presented to the people of ancient Palestine some 2,000 years ago. Like our world today, we sense that we are or could be something more than we are and that maybe there's something missing from human heart which manifests itself in the problems of human history -- some unknown variable that might solve the problem and give us all the answers.

In the Gnostic approach, the metaphorical Logos gives birth to the Transformative Constant -- the Baby X -- in the empty manger of the Unknown Variable. The existing paradigm of "God", which persists even to this day even among a majority of the world's "Christians", was God which men used in various fashion to grant for themselves the throne of political power. A King decides to commit genocide against a neighboring Kingdom for political reason and the story is told as the dictate of a sovereign God who demands that men and women seek His will through Kings, Priests and carefully crafted scriptures which serve more to enslave than to liberate.

Christ does not represent this well-understood and popular notion of God the Father. Christ, the X of Christmas, represents a wholly Alien God -- a complete Unknown Variable.

"I will give you what no eye has seen, what no ear has heard, what no hand has touched, what has not arisen in the human heart."

~Attributed to Yeshua in the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas

Before it had been taught to extract an "eye for an eye" and a "tooth for tooth" but Yeshua, the Son of the Unknown Father, says to "turn the other cheek" and to give a person a coat if that person steals your shirt. Yet, we explain these hard sayings away as we regress back into the known and comforting God of exact rules perfectly fitting for human institutions. We forget about the X altogether and we claim again, as always, that what is known to man -- continuous war, economic exploitation, hunger and poverty -- are the necessary condition of humanity. The call of Christ to embrace an entirely Alien God, but loving God who asks us to practice humility, generosity and forgiveness in the place of arrogance, irrational selfishness and retribution.

The Alien God replaces the illusion of knowing with the truth of not-knowing as represented by the mystery of the Eternal Christ, which is the metaphorical "X" inside both the individual conscience and the collective unconscious. The literal Christ of Christmas happens once in history as a physical date of birth. The metaphorical X of Xmas happens each and every time Light and Love are given the space to birth forgiveness and redemption within the hearts of humankind.

So, as the literals, the fundamentalists and the Orthodox lament the promotion of Xmas while arguing that the literal Christ has been lost to secularization, there are some who passionately embrace the X of Xmas as the perfect symbology of the Eternal Christ who calls us into direct communion with the Alien God, whom we believe is the Father whom Yeshua and others discovered with nothing more complicated than an open heart and a mind which seeks only the Truth.

The Gospel of Truth, part of the collection called "The Gnostic Gospels" lost for 15 centuries until discovered at Nag Hammadi, speaks of this "incomprehensible" Christ -- this X of Xmas in the following verse:

In their heart, the living book of the Living was manifest, the book which was written in the thought and in the mind of the Father and, from before the foundation of the All, is in that incomprehensible part of him."

When we engage that "incomprehensible part of him", we have found the X of Xmas which is always seeking a place to born within us.

Merry Xmas!

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Joseph Campbell & The Matrix


The key to a gneo-gnostic perspective on faith is to not get stuck to the metaphor, as Joseph Campbell would say. The Matrix is a great gneo-gnostic cinematic achievement directly influenced by Joseph Campbell's work. The protagonist's name is "Neo", of course!

All religions will pass...



All religions will pass, but this will remain: simply sitting in a chair and looking in the distance.

~V.V. Rosanov

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

"That which God has joined together..."



"...let no man put asunder." ~Yeshua

I began reading Elaine Pagel's Adam, Eve & the Serpent tonight.  From the intro and 1st chapter, I'm still thinking about how Yeshua made a big deal about divorce when divorce was an accepted practice for Jews in Yeshua's day.  Pagel's scholarship so often puts New Testament teachings in a fresh light and her efforts to show the link between the Genesis story and Yeshua's insistence that marriage represents a sacred union are intriguing given the Apostle Paul's later depature from the implications of Yeshua's teaching.  You really see this over and over in the New Testament where later writers create a more convenient rendering of Christian ethics that is implied by the sayings attributed to Yeshua.

No one does a better of job of taking scholarly religious questions and turning them into intriguing explorations which can be easily enjoyed by a wide audience than Pagels.

If your interested in Gnosticsm, Pagel's book The Gnostic Gospels ranks as core "gospel" within the Gneo-Gnostic canon.  I look forward to the rest of what was her follow-up to TGG, Adam, Eve & the Serpent, so that I can share what jumps out at me on the Gneo-Gnostic Gnews.

Friday, December 5, 2008

I Am Who?


2-043 I have a name that I didn't choose.  I do not recall choosing to exist.  I live in a confusing and conflict rife society with a bunch of other creatures who seem to share my predicament.  A bunch of my fellow humans (that's we call ourselves -- humans) seem to have a lot of answers, but I don't buy any of it.  Call it "faith" or "fantasy" or DNA inspired memetics, I just don't think anyone else knows anything more (or less) than I do about why I'm here, how I got here or where I'm going.  Temporality is the only objective reality to which I can bring myself to subscribe without creating a flood of untenable cognitive dissonance.  The question, "Who am I?" can be answered sufficiently by a simple reversal of subject and predicate -- "I am 'WHO'?"